JUNEAU, Alaska, March 2 (Reuters) - Investigators are reviewing the cause of
an oil production pipeline breach on Alaska's North Slope where upwards of
4,000 gallons (15,100 liters) of fluid spilled, state officials said on Monday.
The production facility is jointly owned by Hilcorp and BP Alaska, but it is
operated by Hilcorp, which took over operations from BP in November when
that company sold off some of its Alaska assets.
an oil production pipeline breach on Alaska's North Slope where upwards of
4,000 gallons (15,100 liters) of fluid spilled, state officials said on Monday.
The production facility is jointly owned by Hilcorp and BP Alaska, but it is
operated by Hilcorp, which took over operations from BP in November when
that company sold off some of its Alaska assets.
The ruptured line sprayed the fluid - made up of oil, natural gas and water - on
Saturday over an area covering about 38,000 square feet (3,500 square
meters), according to a Department of Environmental Conservation report on
Monday.
Spray covered a gravel pad and some tundra area, but there were no reports of
any wildlife being affected, the report said.
DEC specialist Brad Dunker said his office did not receive any further updates
on what caused the 6-year-old line to burst as office staff arrived at the site on
Monday.
Blizzard-like conditions delayed initial cleanup efforts, according to a DEC news
release.
Lori Nelson, the external affairs manager for Hilcorp, said the company was
able to first plug the hole then build a bypass to re-establish flow within the line.
Quest for More Fuel-efficient LNG Ships May Trump Oil Price Slump
The end of last year saw a flurry of activity in the liquefied natural gas (LNG)
shipbuilding industry as several builders finalized orders in December. Daewoo
Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering (DSME), South Korea's third-largest
shipbuilder, bookedorders for nine LNG carriers from two customers on
December 30, four LNG carriers from returning customer Angelicoussis
Shipping
Group and an order for five LNG carriers from an Asian customer, whose
identity
was not disclosed.
shipbuilding industry as several builders finalized orders in December. Daewoo
Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering (DSME), South Korea's third-largest
shipbuilder, bookedorders for nine LNG carriers from two customers on
December 30, four LNG carriers from returning customer Angelicoussis
Shipping
Group and an order for five LNG carriers from an Asian customer, whose
identity
was not disclosed.
ust two weeks earlier, DSME announced that it had signed a contract to provide
six LNG carriers worth 1.3658 trillion won ($1.2429 billion) to a European ship
owner, Hellenic Shipping News reported. Industry experts claim that British oil
major BP placed the order.
DSME Wins Order from Europe for 6 LNG
Carriers Worth 1.3658 Trillion Won
Daewoo Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering (DSME) maintains its good
performance in the liquefied natural gas (LNG) carrier market. It is continuously
making successes in getting orders in LNG carrier market, which has become a
niche market, while orders of offshore plant are slowing down due to global low
oil prices.
The DSME announced that it signed a contract to provide 6 LNG carriers worth
.3658 trillion won (US$1.2429 billion) to a European shipowner. The amount
accounts for 8.9 percent of the DSME sales of last year. According to the
shipbuilding industry, this contract is with major global oil company BP, who
placed the order.
The performance of the DSME has reached more than 400 percent of the
original goal in the business of gas carriers by obtaining orders worth US$7.7
billion from 28 LNG carriers and 12 LPG carriers. The trend is likely to continue
next year, because the orders of Russia’s Yamal project are waiting.
Experts are also presenting positive analyses. Researcher from Daishin
Securities Jeon Jae-cheon said in a report, “The market share of DSME
increased to 69 percent this year,” adding, “DSME is providing excellent engine
systems based on patents.”
However, recent low oil prices will become a burden for the DSME, because
here is a high possibility of a drop-off in growth if offshore plant orders are not
continuously placed.
Source: Business Korea
No comments:
Post a Comment